By Junilla Sledziewski
Generally, the main thing that courts consider when determining whether a TOU is valid and enforceable is evidence that the user actually “assented” to abide by the terms of the agreement. That is, you must show that the user read and understood the terms and voluntarily agreed to abide by them. Additionally, “conspicuous” or obvious notice of the agreement’s existence prior to the user accessing your product or service is very important.
Here are a few guidelines to ensure that your agreement is enforceable if ever called in to question in court.
Match the complexity of your agreement to your business. The value of each sale or service should be considered in light the effect a breach of that agreement would have on your business. For example, a simple “I agree” may be sufficient assent by a consumer that will use the service one time, but if you are dealing with another business on an ongoing basis it might be worthwhile to require more evidence of “assent.” For example, an initial on each page or requiring the user to write out the full name of their business after reviewing the document show a higher degree of assent.
Keep track of updates to your TOU. If you update your TOU, make sure you note the date of the change and what changes were made, so that you know what version was in place at any given time. If you are changing key terms, keep in mind that a large prior customer base may not be subject to them, so you should advise them of the update and, of course, require a new consent.
Consider re-confirmation of assent at various times. You should consider sending out the TOU to major customers at regular intervals and requiring them to acknowledge ongoing consent of the terms. While this seems burdensome, it can protect your business in the long run.
Traditional contracts concepts still apply. Even if your TOU follows all of the foregoing guidelines, if it violates traditional rules of contract it may still be unenforceable. Again, the importance of having an attorney draft the TOU cannot be understated.
Users should be given the opportunity to reject the agreement. This seems obvious, but if the users’ only option is to select “I agree,” this will weigh against your argument that the user voluntarily consented to the terms.
This article originally appeared at MiamiLegalEagle.net and is republished with
permission of its author.
This article does not constitute legal advice and is intended to act only as a guideline on the foregoing topic. You should always consult an attorney regarding any legal issue that might affect your rights, and you should research your attorney’s background and credentials before
© Junilla Sledziewski, 2013